Which situation qualifies for coverage under the Removal Clause?

The Removal Clause in an insurance policy typically provides coverage for personal property that is moved from its original location due to a significant threat, such as a fire. This clause ensures that the insured can take proactive measures to protect their property from damage when a peril is imminent.

In the context of the situation provided, when the insured moved personal property to a storage facility due to the threat of fire, this action is both reasonable and aligned with the intent of the Removal Clause. It highlights the insured's efforts to mitigate loss by relocating the property to a safer location.

The other scenarios do not align with the provisions of the Removal Clause as closely. For instance, selling property while on vacation does not indicate a threat to the property itself and doesn't involve relocation due to a peril. Moving property without notifying the insurer may breach the policy terms, and thus it wouldn’t qualify for coverage under this clause. Finally, storing property in a different province may introduce complications regarding policy applicability and coverage limits, rather than addressing a specific threat to the property.